On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 06:56:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > Note that I've added a few questions to individuals involved with
> > specific points. If you're in the To: list, please search for your name.
>
> I'm not sure which of my commits you want me to opine on, other than
>
> > <listitem>
> > <!--
> > Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> > 2019-01-30 [5f5c01459] Allow RECORD and RECORD[] to be specified in function co
> > -->
> > <para>
> > Allow <type>RECORD</type> and <type>RECORD[]</type> to be specified
> > as a function <link linkend="sql-createfunction">return-value
> > record</link> (Elvis Pranskevichus)
> > </para>
> > <para>
> > DETAIL?
> > </para>
> > </listitem>
>
> > This description doesn't sound accurate to me. Tom?
>
> Yeah, maybe better
>
> Allow <type>RECORD</type> and <type>RECORD[]</type> to be used
> as column types in a query's column definition list for a
> table function that is declared to return <type>RECORD</type>
> (Elvis Pranskevichus)
>
> You could link to "queries-tablefunctions" which describes the column
> definition business; it's much more specific than "sql-createfunction".
Done.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +