On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:32:21PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > >> That seems too confusing.
> >
> > > Ok. Are you voting for using EXEC as a keyword to replace ANALYZE?
> >
> > FWIW, given the conflict against "EXPLAIN EXECUTE prepared_stmt_name",
> > we should probably just drop the whole idea. It seemed like a great
> > idea at the time, but it's going to confuse people not just Bison.
>
> +1. I think trying to replace ANALYZE with something else is setting
> ourselves up for years, possibly decades, worth of confusion. And
> without any real benefit.
>
> Defaulting BUFFERS to ON is probably a reasonable change, thuogh.
Would this be worth back-patching? I ask because adding it will cause
fairly large (if mechanical) churn in the regression tests.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate