Re: Generic Plans for Prepared Statement are 158155 times slowerthan Custom Plans
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Generic Plans for Prepared Statement are 158155 times slowerthan Custom Plans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190520221631.6i47hwyodfqdk2ym@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Re: Generic Plans for Prepared Statement are 158155 timesslower than Custom Plans (Deepak Somaiya <deepsom@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Re: Generic Plans for Prepared Statement are 158155 times slower thanCustom Plans
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:37:34PM +0000, Deepak Somaiya wrote: > wow this is interesting! >@Tom, Bruce, David - Experts >Any idea why would changing the datatype would cause so much degradation - this is even when plan remains the same ,datais same. >Deepak > On Friday, May 17, 2019, 2:36:05 AM PDT, Naik, Sameer <Sameer_Naik@bmc.com> wrote: > > >Deepak, > >I changed the datatype from citext to text and now everything works fine. > >The data distribution is same, plan is same, yet there is a huge performance degradation when citext is used instead oftext. > >However the business case requires case insensitive string handling. > >I am looking forward to some expert advice here when dealing with citext data type. > > It's generally a good idea to share explain analyze output for both versions of the query - both with citext and text. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: