Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices
Дата
Msg-id 20190507153006.GI6197@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Greetings,

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com> writes:
> >>> IMHO, what makes more sense is to show the name of associated toast
> >>> table in the \dt+ of the normal table.
>
> >> I'm not for that: it's useless information in at least 99.44% of cases.
>
> > I don't think I'd put it in \dt+, but the toast table is still
> > pg_toast.pg_toast_{relOid}, right?  What about showing the OID of the
> > table in the \d output, eg:
> > => \d comments
> >            Table "public.comments" (50788)
>
> Not unless you want to break every regression test that uses \d.
> Instability of the output is also a reason not to show the
> toast table's name in the parent's \d[+].

So we need a way to turn it off.  That doesn't seem like it'd be hard to
implement and the information is certainly quite useful.

Thanks,

Stephen

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: make \d pg_toast.foo show its indices
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL