Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6
Дата
Msg-id 20190502210253.lt4p46dvllxarajg@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2019-05-02 16:54:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I just finished a successful run of the core regression tests with CCA.
> Given the calendar, I think that's about as much CCA testing as I should
> do personally.  I'll make a cleanup pass on this patch and try to get it
> pushed within a few hours, if there are not objections.

Sounds good to me.


> How do you feel about the other patch to rejigger the order of operations
> in CommandCounterIncrement?  I think that's a bug, but it's probably
> noncritical for most people.  What I'm leaning towards for that one is
> waiting till after the minor releases, then pushing it to all branches.

I've not yet have the mental cycles to look more deeply into it. I
thought your explanation why the current way is wrong made sense, but I
wanted to look a bit more into how it came to be how it is now. I agree
that pushing after the minors would make sense, it's too subtle to go
for it now.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6