Re: Odd behavior of partitioned ALTER TABLE ONLY ... ADD PRIMARY KEY

On 2019-Apr-21, Tom Lane wrote:

> ISTM that this is a bug, not a feature: if there's any point at
> all to saying ONLY in this context, it's that we're not supposed
> to be doing anything as expensive as adding a new constraint to
> a child partition.  No?  So I think that this should have failed.

Hmm, yeah, this is not intentional and I agree that it shouldn't be
doing this.

> We need to require the partition(s) to already have attnotnull set.

Sounds good to me, yes.

Do you want me to see about this?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services