Re: Commit(?) overhead
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Commit(?) overhead |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20190409222336.45ekgwcj4ot3zxkq@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Commit(?) overhead (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Commit(?) overhead
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi, On 2019-04-09 17:12:27 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > You could test that's the issue by comparing with fsync=off (please read what > that means and don't run your production cluster like that). > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-FSYNC I suggest testing it with synchronous_commit=off instead. That's about as fast for this type of workload, doesn't have cluster corruption issues, the window of a transaction not persisting in case of a crash is very small, and it can just set by any user in individual sessions. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: