Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Дата
Msg-id 20190404130258.GA7320@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2019-Apr-04, Thomas Munro wrote:

> I don't think it's project policy to put a single typedef into its own
> header like that, and I'm not sure where else to put it.

shrug.  Looks fine to me.  I suppose if we don't have it anywhere, it's
just because we haven't needed that particular trick yet.  Creating a
file with a lone typedef seems better than using uint32 to me.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database
Следующее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages atthe end of relation