On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 01:18:05PM +0000, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> When reading another codepath, I happened to notice a few codepaths where we do
> pg_malloc() immediately followed by a memset( .. 0, ..), without there being a
> justification (that I can see) for not using pg_malloc0() instead. The attached
> patch changes to pg_malloc0(), and passes make check.
If we simplify all of them (and that's not really a big deal), I have
spotted two extra places on top of what you noticed, one in gist.c
where ROTATEDIST is defined and a second one in tablefunc.c.
Thoughts?
--
Michael