At Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:32:49 +0100, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote in
<CA+q6zcUSuFBhGVFZN_AVSxRbt5wr_4_YEYwv8PcQB=m6J6Zpvg@mail.gmail.com>
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:05 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Although there are still some rough edges, e.g. going forth, back and forth
> > again leads to a sutiation, when `_bt_first` is not applied anymore and the
> > first element is wrongly skipped. I'll try to fix it with the next version of
> > patch.
>
> It turns out that `_bt_skip` was unnecessary applied every time when scan was
> restarted from the beginning. Here is the fixed version of patch.
> nbtsearch.c: In function ‘_bt_skip’:
> nbtsearch.c:1292:11: error: ‘struct IndexScanDescData’ has no member named ‘xs_ctup’; did you mean ‘xs_itup’?
> scan->xs_ctup.t_self = currItem->heapTid;
Unfortunately a recent commit c2fe139c20 hit this.
Date: Mon Mar 11 12:46:41 2019 -0700
> Index scans now store the result of a search in
> IndexScanDesc->xs_heaptid, rather than xs_ctup->t_self. As the
> target is not generally a HeapTuple anymore that seems cleaner.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center