On 2019-03-07 08:52:21 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:11 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > slot that's compatible with the "target" table. You can get compatible
> > slot callbakcs by calling table_slot_callbacks(), or directly create one
> > by calling table_gimmegimmeslot() (likely to be renamed :)).
>
> Hmm. I assume the issue is that table_createslot() was already taken
> for another purpose, so then when you needed another callback you went
> with table_givemeslot(), and then when you needed a third API to do
> something in the same area the best thing available was
> table_gimmeslot(), which meant that the fourth API could only be
> table_gimmegimmeslot().
>
> Does that sound about right?
It was 3 AM, and I thought it was hilarious...