Hi,
On 2019-03-06 19:21:33 +0100, Tobias Gierke wrote:
> On 06.03.19 18:42, Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > It's hard to know precisely without running a profile of the
> > workload. My suspicion is that the bottleneck in this query is the use
> > of numeric, which has fairly slow operations, including aggregation. And
> > they're too complicated to be inlined.
> >
> > Generally there's definitely advantage in JITing aggregation.
> >
> > There's a lot of further improvements on the table with better JIT code
> > generation, I just haven't gotten around implementing those :(
>
> Thanks for the quick response ! I think you're onto something with the
> numeric type. I replaced it with bigint and repeated my test and now I get a
> nice 40% speedup
Cool. It'd really be worthwhile for somebody to work on adding fastpaths
to the numeric code...
Greetings,
Andres Freund