On 2019-Mar-06, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:03 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > One, err, small issue with that idea is that we need the param numbers
> > not to conflict for any "progress update providers" that are to be used
> > simultaneously by any command.
>
> Is that really an issue? I think progress reporting -- at least with
> the current infrastructure -- is only ever going to be possible for
> utility commands, not queries. And those really shouldn't have very
> many sorts going on at once.
Well, I don't think it is, but I thought it was worth pointing out
explicitly.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services