Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Shawn Debnath
Тема Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Дата
Msg-id 20190305171557.GA30015@f01898859afd.ant.amazon.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:53:16AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> > +#include "fmgr.h"
> > +#include "storage/block.h"
> > +#include "storage/relfilenode.h"
> > +#include "storage/smgr.h"
> > +#include "storage/sync.h"
> 
> > Why do we need to include fmgr.h in md.h?
> 
> More generally, any massive increase in an include file's inclusions
> is probably a sign that you need to refactor.  Cross-header inclusions
> are best avoided altogether if you can --- obviously that's not always
> possible, but we should minimize them.  We've had some very unfortunate
> problems in the past from indiscriminate #includes in headers.

Agree - I do pay attention to these, but this one slipped through the 
cracks (copied smgr.h then edited to remove smgr bits). Thanks for 
catching this, will fix in the next patch iteration.

-- 
Shawn Debnath
Amazon Web Services (AWS)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rare SSL failures on eelpout
Следующее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Optimze usage of immutable functions as relation