Re: Drop type "smgr"?

On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 10:33:06AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:

> It doesn't make any sense to put things like clog or any other SLRU in
> a non-default tablespace though.  It's perfectly OK if not all smgr
> implementations know how to deal with tablespaces, and the SLRU
> support should just not support that.

If the generic storage manager, or whatever we end up calling it, ends 
up being generic enough - its possible that tablespace value would have 
to be respected.


-- 
Shawn Debnath
Amazon Web Services (AWS)