Greetings,
* Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker (ilmari@ilmari.org) wrote:
> David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
> > On 2/25/19 12:35 AM, Christophe Pettus wrote:
> >>> On Feb 24, 2019, at 14:19, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> >>> You say above that the new interface is unquestionably an improvement
> >>> and here say that we shouldn't deprecate the old one in favor of it
> >>> (even though we actually already have... but that's beside the point I'm
> >>> trying to make here), so what you're advocating for is that we keep an
> >>> old and known broken interface that we know causes real issues even
> >>> after we've developed a new and unquestionably better one.
> >>
> >> Yes, I am advocating exactly that. The reason that I think we need
> >> to keep the old one (or, at least, not remove it as soon as 12)...
> >
> > Exclusive backup will not be removed for PG12. There wasn't support for
> > it so I push it out to PG13.
>
> How about making the deprecation more obvious in PG12, by making
> pg_start_backup() in exclusive mode issue a WARNING that it will be
> removed in PG13?
So.. We've more-or-less come full circle back to where the thread had
left off last time- the plan is to update the documentation to make it
clearer that the exclusive mode is deprecated and that it's going to be
removed, and then we'll actually remove it in PG13.
We could also add such a warning but I'm not entirely convinced it's a
good idea. There was some earlier discussion about it that I'd probably
want to go back and reread first.
Thanks!
Stephen