Re: Prepared transaction releasing locks before deregistering its GID
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prepared transaction releasing locks before deregistering its GID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190225052823.GB30864@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Prepared transaction releasing locks before deregistering its GID (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Prepared transaction releasing locks before deregistering its GID
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 08:44:43AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Thanks. I am still looking at this patch an extra time, so this may > take at most a couple of days from my side. For now I have committed > the test portion, which is independently useful and caused recovery of > multixact post-commit callbacks to never be stressed. Done. I have spent some time today looking at the performance of the patch, designing a worst-case scenario to see how much bloat this adds in COMMIT PREPARED by running across many sessions 2PC transactions taking SHARE locks across many tables, as done in the script attached. This test case runs across multiple sessions: BEGIN; SELECT lock_tables($NUM_TABLES); PREPARE TRANSACTION 't_$i'; COMMIT PREPARED 't_$i'; lock_tables() is able to take a lock on a set of tables, bloating the number of locks registered in the 2PC transaction, still those do not conflict, so it gives an idea of the extra impact of holding TwoPhaseStateLock longer. The script also includes a function to create thousands of tables easily, and can be controlled with a couple of parameters: - number of tables to use, which will be locked. - number of sessions. - run time of pgbench. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: