Re: BUG #15631: Generated as identity field in a temporary tablewith on commit drop corrupts system catalogs

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 05:03:29PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Yeah, I'm OK on that, but that's not really the problem here.  This is
> not a case where a later step in a complex DDL command needs to see what
> an earlier step did.  This is about that something later in the
> transaction needs to see what happened earlier in the transaction.  This
> does not seem to be the job of each individual DDL command; they don't
> know what someone later might want to look at.  Otherwise many DDL
> command implementations are lacking this CCI.  I think the CCI should be
> more like at the end of ProcessUtility().

Not all utility commands need a CCI, for example take VACUUM.
--
Michael