Hi,
On 2019-02-13 12:16:33 +0100, Chris Travers wrote:
> As a note here, I have worked on projects where there could be 2-week-long
> idle-in-transaction states (no joke, we tuned things to only use virtual
> xids for most of that time), and having an ability to set
> idle-in-transaction timeouts to figures of greater than a month are things
> I could imagine doing. I would certainly favor the idea of 64-big GUC
> variables as a general rule.
How about proposing a patch for it in a new thread?
Greetings,
Andres Freund