Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order(regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

On 2019-Feb-08, Tom Lane wrote:

> Also, I came across some coding in CloneFkReferencing() that looks fishy
> as hell: that function imagines that it can delete an existing trigger
> with nothing more than a summary CatalogTupleDelete().  I didn't do
> anything about that here, but if it's not broken, I'd like to see an
> explanation why not.  I added a comment complaining about the lack of
> pg_depend cleanup, and there's also the question of whether we don't
> need to broadcast a relcache inval for the trigger's table.

Oops, this is new code in 0464fdf07f69 (Jan 21st).  Unless you object,
I'll study a fix for this now, to avoid letting it appear in the minor
next week.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services