On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:02:23PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:55:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There's been talk periodically of having an aggressive triage effort
> >> to try to sort through the pending patches and decide which ones have
> >> no hope of making it to commit in the last CF. Then, if we just push
> >> those off to the next cycle immediately and focus our attention on the
> >> ones that do have a credible chance, we might get more of the latter
> >> ones done.
>
> > The ones I am really worried about are the ones that keep getting
> > delayed, e.g., CTE inlining, online checksums, multi-variate statistics.
>
> The only thing keeping me from committing CTE inlining today is doubt
> about whether we have consensus on the syntax. Those other two I don't
> know the status of.
I am thinking we should see which items we really want for PG 12 _now_
and allocate resources/help to get them done, rather than being
surprised they didn't make it. I am glad we are in good shape with
CTEs, since that has been a long-requested feature.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +