fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20190201162404.onngi77f26baem4g@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple
Re: fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
While working on the patch to slotify trigger.c I got somewhat confused
by the need to expand tuples in trigger.c:
static HeapTuple
GetTupleForTrigger(EState *estate,
EPQState *epqstate,
ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
ItemPointer tid,
LockTupleMode lockmode,
TupleTableSlot **newSlot)
{
...
if (HeapTupleHeaderGetNatts(tuple.t_data) < relation->rd_att->natts)
result = heap_expand_tuple(&tuple, relation->rd_att);
else
result = heap_copytuple(&tuple);
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
There's no explanation why GetTupleForTrigger() needs expanding tuples,
but most other parts of postgres don't. Normally deforming ought to take
care of expanding missing attrs.
As far as I can tell, the reason that it's needed is that heap_gettar()
wasn't updated along the rest of the functions. heap_deform_tuple(),
heap_attisnull() etc look for missing attrs, but heap_getattr() doesn't.
That, to me, makes no sense. The reason that we see a difference in
regression test output is that composite_to_json() uses heap_getattr(),
if it used heap_deform_tuple (which'd be considerably faster), we'd get
the default value.
Am I missing something?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: