On 2019-Jan-25, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:56:05AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Uh, I didn't think it was necessary nor desirable to rename the flag,
> > only the user-visible message.
>
> Oh, OK. I have overstated your comment then. Are you fine with the
> attached instead? The flag name remains the same, and the comment is
> updated.
I am, except that the change of "table" to "object" in xact.c line 2262
makes the new paragraph read a bit weird -- it's now saying "if we've
added a temp object ... Other objects have the same problem". Doesn't
make sense. If you keep that word as "table", it works fine.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services