On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:08:52PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> While working on REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, I have noticed that
> index_build() does not need its argument isprimary. Perhaps it is
> not worth bothering, but for the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY business this
> removes the need to open an index when triggering a concurrent
> build.
>
> The flag was introduced in 3fdeb189, but f66e8bf actually forgot to
> finish the cleanup as index_update_stats() has simplified its
> interface.
And committed as of 289198c, and back to the real deal..
--
Michael