Shouldn't current_schema() be at least PARALLEL RESTRICTED?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Shouldn't current_schema() be at least PARALLEL RESTRICTED?
Дата
Msg-id 20190118024618.GF1883@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Shouldn't current_schema() be at least PARALLEL RESTRICTED?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi all,

While working on the recent issues with 2PC and temporary objects I
have added a test case based on current_schema() for the first time in
history, and the buildfarm complained about it, as mentioned here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190118005949.GD1883@paquier.xyz

The has been causing crake and lapwing to complain about
current_schema() failing to create a temporary schema, which can
happen when invoked for the first time of a session:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2019-01-18%2000%3A34%3A20
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=lapwing&dt=2019-01-18%2001%3A20%3A01

Here is the problem:
SET search_path TO 'pg_temp';
BEGIN;
SELECT current_schema() ~ 'pg_temp' AS is_temp_schema;
- is_temp_schema
-----------------
- t
-(1 row)
-
+ERROR:  cannot create temporary tables during a parallel operation
PREPARE TRANSACTION 'twophase_search';
-ERROR:  cannot PREPARE a transaction that has operated on temporary namespace

current_schemas() also has this problem.

For now I have stabilized the test by making sure that non-parallel
plans get used, which makes the buildfarm happy, still that's just a
workaround in my opinion.   One of the reasons why current_schema()
can create temporary schemas is that there are string dependencies
with search_path and the way sessions use it, hence it seems to me
that it would be better to mark the function at least parallel
restricted on HEAD and avoid any unstable behavior?

Thoughts?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mitar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Следующее
От: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority