Re: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD
Дата
Msg-id 20190116020748.5lpniu26eercs3t4@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi,

On 2019-01-16 11:02:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> f3db7f16 has proved that it can be a bad idea to run pg_resetwal on a
> data folder which does not match the version it has been compiled
> with.
> 
> As of HEAD, PG_CONTROL_VERSION is still 1100:
> $ pg_controldata | grep "pg_control version"
> pg_control version number:            1100
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to bump it up to 1200?

We don't commonly bump that without corresponding control version
changes. I don't see what we'd gain by the bump?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Bump up PG_CONTROL_VERSION on HEAD
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: current_logfiles not following group access and instead followslog_file_mode permissions