On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 10:17:32AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm not sure what the coverage is in detail in this area. It seems we
> already have tests for not-specific-recovery-target, maybe not in this
> file, but most of the other tests rely on that, no?
[... Checking ...]
There are no tests on HEAD using directly recovery_target_timeline in
any .pl or .pm file, which is definitely not a good idea.
004_timeline_switch.pl is actually designed for checking the latest
timeline, which is fine. 002_archiving.pl somewhat tests for the
current timeline, still it is not really designed for this purpose.
--
Michael