On 2018-12-31 21:35:57 +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>
> Alvaro> After looking at the proposed grammar again today and in danger
> Alvaro> of repeating myself, IMO allowing the concurrency keyword to
> Alvaro> appear outside the parens would be a mistake. Valid commands:
>
> Alvaro> REINDEX (VERBOSE, CONCURRENTLY) TABLE foo;
> Alvaro> REINDEX (CONCURRENTLY) INDEX bar;
>
> We burned that bridge with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY; to make REINDEX
> require different syntax would be too inconsistent.
>
> If we didn't have all these existing uses of CONCURRENTLY without
> parens, your argument might have more merit; but we do.
+1