Re: Question about unlogged to logged conversion

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Question about unlogged to logged conversion
Дата
Msg-id 20181227230240.GC2196@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Question about unlogged to logged conversion  (Ravi Krishna <srkrishna@fastmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:52:14PM -0500, Ravi Krishna wrote:
> Unlogged tables are not stored in the catalog like a regular table. When
> it is converted to a logged table , the entire operation is logged (goes
> into wal logs) in one single transaction, blocking the entire table
> during the process. IMO this makes unlogged -> logged workflow not a
> right fit for large tables.  In other products I have used, large tables
> are set to unlogged mode before bulk load and then set back to normal
> logged mode.

If you are interested of how things happen at code level, you can grep
for INIT_FORKNUM, which is the initial state of an unlogged table used
when doing crash recovery.  And while the main fork's data is never
WAL-logged, this initial fork needs to be included in WAL.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ravi Krishna
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Question about unlogged to logged conversion
Следующее
От: Igor Korot
Дата:
Сообщение: libpq bug?