Re: random() (was Re: New GUC to sample log queries)

On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 08:46:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> One thing I was wondering is if we should try to enforce a policy
> like this by putting, say,
>
> #define random() pg_random()
>
> into port.h or so.  That would have the advantages of not having to touch
> any existing calls and not having to worry too much about future patches
> breaking the policy.  On the other hand, it's conceivable that third-party
> extensions might get annoyed with us for hijacking a libc function.
> Thoughts?

Not much a fan of that for random() to be honest as we are talking
about 15 callers in the backend code and enforcing a call of in a
low-level library..
--
Michael