On 2018-Dec-10, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 20:24, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > However, for pruned partitions' subplans, what's actually shown is the
> > string "(never executed)", not loops. So, wouldn't it be better to tell
> > the readers to look for that instead of "loops"?
>
> I don't really see any issues with the existing documentation here.
> Remember that pruning can be performed multiple times when a parameter
> changes that was found to match the partition key and the
> Append/MergeAppend is rescanned.
I lean towards Amit's side. I think we're too laconic about many
details of EXPLAIN's output. This is two lines about an interesting
detail that's pretty obscure. It doesn't hurt to have it there.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services