Hi,
On 2018-12-14 22:54:14 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Dec-13, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Looking at the existing entries, it seems like we'd have to have
> > one special case: schema public has OID 2200 but is intentionally
> > not pinned. I wouldn't have a hard time with teaching isObjectPinned
> > about that; though if it turns out that many places need to know
> > about it, maybe it's not workable.
>
> Why not just move that OID outside the Genbki special range? I have
> seen quite a few installs where schema public was removed and later
> re-added. I've never seen a query hardcode OID 2200, and I'd call one
> which does buggy.
+1
Greetings,
Andres Freund