Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Дата
Msg-id 20181214120058.m56xz2mvqieo6nrt@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Dec-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On 14/12/2018 01:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 07:14:57PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >> Based on at least a quick looking around, the actual grammar rule seems
> >> to match my recollection[1], adverbs should typically go AFTER the
> >> verb + object, and the adverb shouldn't ever be placed between the verb
> >> and the object.
> > 
> > This part has been a long debate already in 2012-2013 when I sent the
> > first iterations of the patch, and my memories on the matter are that
> > the grammar you are showing here matches with the past agreement.
> 
> Do you happen to have a link for that?  I didn't find anything.

I think putting the CONCURRENTLY in the parenthesized list of options is
most sensible.

CREATE INDEX didn't have such an option list when we added this feature
there; see 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/200608011143.k71Bh9c22067%40momjian.us#029e9a7ee8cb38beee494ef7891bec1d
for some discussion about that grammar.  Our options were not great ...

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Suraj Kharage
Дата:
Сообщение: Catalog views failed to show partitioned table information.
Следующее
От: "Matsumura, Ryo"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG