Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording
Дата
Msg-id 20181127015443.GB16835@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Section 26.2.1. Planning wording  (Theo Kramer <theo@flame.co.za>)
Список pgsql-docs
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:38:02AM +0200, Theo Kramer wrote:
> Section 26.2.1. Planning wording includes the following
> 
> "In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not
work."
> 
> would  be more correct if it read as follows
> 
> "In any case the CPU architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
> 
> as “hardware architecture” would imply the difference between say Dell and IBM which should be ok if the CPU is the
samearchitecture ...
 

I feel we might have cases where differences beyond the CPU might
matter, though I can't think of any now.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: missing windows info
Следующее
От: PG Doc comments form
Дата:
Сообщение: Return codes for archive and restore commands