Re: Special role for subscriptions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: Special role for subscriptions
Дата
Msg-id 20181103162049.GV4184@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Special role for subscriptions  (Evgeniy Efimkin <efimkin@yandex-team.ru>)
Ответы Re: Special role for subscriptions  (Evgeniy Efimkin <efimkin@yandex-team.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Greetings,

* Evgeniy Efimkin (efimkin@yandex-team.ru) wrote:
> In postgresql 10 and 11 only superuser can create/alter subscriptions.
> If there was a special role (like pg_monitor), it would be more easy to grant control on subscriptions.
> I can make a patch if there are no objections against it.

I think the short answer is 'yes, we should let non-superusers do that',
but the longer answer is:

What level of access makes sense for managing subscriptions?  Should
there be a way to say "user X is allowed to create a subscription for
remote system Y, but only for tables that exist in schema Q"?

My general feeling is 'yes', though, of course, I don't want to say that
we have to have all of that before we move forward with allowing
non-superusers to create subscriptions, but I do think we want to make
sure that we have a well thought-out path for how to get from where we
are now to a system which has a lot more granularity, and to do our best
to try avoiding any paths that might paint us into a corner.

Thanks!

Stephen

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Raiskup
Дата:
Сообщение: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces