On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 09:27:39AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You actually do a lot, moving just one person with MP as initials to
> consider moving the function as being parallel-safe. Thanks for the
> points you raised, what needs to be done looks clear now.
So anybody has an objection with marking the function as parallel-safe?
I'd like to do so if that's not the case and close the case.
What has been raised on this thread is more than I hoped first. Thanks
Amit and Robert for the additional input!
--
Michael