Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums
Дата
Msg-id 20181012005614.GC26424@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:17:57AM +0000, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Add TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums
>
> All options available in the utility get coverage:
> - Tests with disabled page checksums.
> - Tests with enabled test checksums.
> - Emulation of corruption and broken checksums with a full scan and
> single relfilenode scan.

culicidae is failing after this commit in an interesting way, so we
really needed some tests for this utility:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=culicidae&br=HEAD

ok 7 - fails with corrupted data status (got 1 vs expected 1)
not ok 8 - fails with corrupted data stdout /(?^:Bad checksums:.*1)/

#   Failed test 'fails with corrupted data stdout /(?^:Bad checksums:.*1)/'
#   at t/002_actions.pl line 57.
#                   ''
#     doesn't match '(?^:Bad checksums:.*1)'
not ok 9 - fails with corrupted data stderr /(?^:checksum verification failed)/

So the checksum failure is happening, but the output is not present.
What's not clear to me is that all the other hosts running Debian SID
don't complain, and that the follow-up test on a single relfilenode is
able to pass with a test much similar to the previous one.  Is the issue
that we should just call fflush() on stderr and stdout at the end of
main() in pg_verify_checksum.c?  Shouldn't we back-patch that?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Debian mips: Failed test 'Check expected t_009_tbl data onstandby'
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums