On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 05:12:48AM -0400, Corey Huinker wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 5:04 AM Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:00 PM Christoph Moench-Tegeder <
> > cmt@burggraben.net> wrote:
> >
> >> You can:
> >> COPY ( query ) TO 'filename';
> >>
> > it is for COPY FROM
> >
> > regards
> > Surafel
> >
>
> It didn't get far, but you may want to take a look at a rejected patch for
> copy_srf() (set returning function)
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CADkLM%3DdoeiWQX4AGtDNG4PsWfSXz3ai7kY%3DPZm3sUhsUeev9Bg%40mail.gmail.com
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/12/869/
>
> Having a set returning function gives you the full expressiveness of SQL,
> at the cost of an extra materialization step.
I wonder whether something JIT-like could elide this. A very
interesting subset of such WHEN clauses could be pretty
straight-forward to implement in a pretty efficient way.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate