Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
| От | David Fetter |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20181004184952.GO25294@fetter.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote: > On 10/03/2018 05:57 PM, David Fetter wrote: > >Is there any meaningful distinction between "inlining," by which I > >mean converting to a subquery, and predicate pushdown, which > >would happen at least for a first cut, at the rewrite stage? > > Sorry, but I do not think I understand your question. The ability to push > down predicates is just one of the potential benefits from inlining. Oracle appears to have such a distinction, and it appears we don't. https://medium.com/@hakibenita/be-careful-with-cte-in-postgresql-fca5e24d2119 Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: