Re: Performance improvements for src/port/snprintf.c

Hi,

On 2018-10-03 13:31:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do not see the point of messing with snprintf.c here.  I doubt that
> strfromd is faster than the existing sprintf call (because the latter
> can use ".*" instead of serializing and deserializing the precision).

I'm confused, the numbers I posted clearly show that it's faster?

Greetings,

Andres Freund