Re: Speed up the removal of WAL files

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:50:03AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael@paquier.xyz]
>> Hm.  durable_xx should remain a sane operation as an isolated call as you
>> still get the same problem if a crash happens before flushing the parent...
>> Fujii-san idea also has value to speed up the end of recovery but this costs
>> as well in extra recycling operations post promotion.  If the checkpoint
>> was to happen a the end of recovery then that would be more logic, but we
>> don't for performance reasons.  Let's continue to discuss on this thread.
>> If you have any patch to offer, let's also look at them.
>>
>> Anyway, as things are pretty much idle on this thread for a couple of days
>> and that we are still discussing potential ideas, I think that this entry
>> should be marked as returned with feedback.  Thoughts?
>
> OK, I moved this to the next CF.  Thank you for your cooperation.

The patch is still roughly with this status, so I am marking it as
returned with feedback.
--
Michael