On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 04:16:45PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Hello.
>
> > Just my 2 cents: that was a hacky use case for development reasons.
>
> I know. So I intended to preserve the parameter with default of 100% if no
> one strongly objects to preserve. Then I abandoned that since I had:p
So, are we going to output a notice if a non-100% fill factor is
specified?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +