Re: Found incorrect output in pg_lsclusters

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Found incorrect output in pg_lsclusters
Дата
Msg-id 20180731194029.GB2791@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Found incorrect output in pg_lsclusters  (Pash Ebash <ep4sh2k@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 02:07:42PM +0300, Pash Ebash wrote:
> postgres@PC:/root$ uname -a
> Linux PC 4.9.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.30-2+deb9u5 (2017-09-19) x86_64 GNU/
> Linux
> 
> postgres@PC:/root$
>  PostgreSQL 9.6.8 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 6.3.0-18)
> 6.3.0 20170516, 64-bit
> (1 row)
> 
> 
> postgres@PC:/root$ pg_lsclusters
> Ver Cluster  Port Status Owner    Data directory            Log file
> 9.6 asterisk 5433 down   postgres /postgresql/data/asterisk /var/log/postgresql
> /postgresql-9.6-asterisk.log
> 9.6 db1    5432 online postgres /postgresql/data/db1    /var/log/postgresql/
> postgresql-9.6-db1.log
> 
> postgres@PC:/root$ pg_ctlcluster 9.6 asterisk status
> could not change directory to "/root": Отказано в доступе
> pg_ctl: server is running (PID: 32275)
> /usr/lib/postgresql/9.6/bin/postgres "-D" "/postgresql/data/asterisk" "-c"
> "config_file=/etc/postgresql/9.6/asterisk/postgresql.conf"
> 
> 
> But...Client program works well with current DB, but pg_lsclusters outputs that
> cluster is down.
> Another cluster works well :)
> Thanks for your work!

'pg_lsclusters' is not a program the Postgres community maintains.  I
think it is from Debian and/or Ubuntu --- I would report it to them.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #15306: Use pkg-config for searching libxml2 header
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes whendoing nasty on immutable index function