Re: Failed assertion due to procedure created with SECURITY DEFINERoption
| От | Andres Freund | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Failed assertion due to procedure created with SECURITY DEFINERoption | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20180629171917.nve4ane5bygbquze@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Failed assertion due to procedure created with SECURITY DEFINERoption (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Failed assertion due to procedure created with SECURITY DEFINERoption
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Hi,
On 2018-06-29 13:56:12 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/29/18 13:07, amul sul wrote:
> > This happens because of in fmgr_security_definer() function we are
> > changing  global variable SecurityRestrictionContext and in the
> > StartTransaction() insisting it should be zero, which is the problem.
> 
> Hmm, what is the reason for this insistation?
Because it's supposed to be reset by AbortTransaction(), after an error.
    /*
     * Reset user ID which might have been changed transiently.  We need this
     * to clean up in case control escaped out of a SECURITY DEFINER function
     * or other local change of CurrentUserId; therefore, the prior value of
     * SecurityRestrictionContext also needs to be restored.
     *
     * (Note: it is not necessary to restore session authorization or role
     * settings here because those can only be changed via GUC, and GUC will
     * take care of rolling them back if need be.)
     */
    SetUserIdAndSecContext(s->prevUser, s->prevSecContext);
I think all the state managed by transactions should be reviewed for
interactions with procedures. Can't imagine this being the only issue.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: