On 2018-06-27 13:44:03 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On further reflection, on the basis that it's the most conservative
> change, +1 for Fujii-san's close-in-reverse-order idea. We should
> reconsider that data structure for 12; there doesn't seems to be a
> good reason to carry all those comments warning about performance when
> the O(1) version is shorter than the comments.
Agreed on this. I like the dlist version more than the earlier one, so
let's fix it up, for v12+. But regardless I'd argue that we consider
disabling that infrastructure while in recovery - it's just unnecessary.
Greetings,
Andres Freund