On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 05:13:38PM -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
> Checking my understanding as in $subject:
>
> A TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE has had its specified time zone used at the point
> of entry to convert it to Z time, and then discarded. If I have to map one
> of these to a date/time-with-time-zone datatype in another language, I may
> as well unconditionally map it to the indicated date/time values and
> explicit time zone Z, because there is no information available to
> reconstruct what the original explicit time zone was.
You might want to read my blog about this:
https://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2017.html#September_27_2017
> A TIME WITH TIME ZONE actually carries its original explicit time zone
> with it, but only in the form of an offset, no named time zone or DST
> indication. I can map one of those faithfully if the other language has
> a time-with-zone-in-offset-form data type.
>
> Speaking of time zones, what PLs out there have a notion of time zone
> maintained by their language runtimes, and how many of those use the
> PostgreSQL session_timezone to initialize that?
That's a good question.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +