Hi,
On 2018-06-19 14:22:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > It'd probably be good enough if the error detection worked with glibc's
> > headers. Even if nobody noticed before a particular patch went in,
> > the buildfarm would surely find it.
>
> On second thought, we'd also need a solution for Windows, because we
> have some files that only get compiled for Windows. But even two
> separate tests of this sort seems reasonable.
Could anybody working on windows (Amit, Michael?) check whether there's
an equivalent to my _FEATURES_H trick?
Greetings,
Andres Freund