Hi,
On 2018-06-19 18:41:24 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I'm confused. I thought you wanted to prefetch directly to shared buffers,
> so that it also works with direct I/O in the future. But now you suggest to
> use posix_fadvise() to work around the synchronous buffer read limitation. I
> don't follow ...
Well, I have multiple goals. For one I think using prefetching without
any sort of backpressure and mechanism to see which have completed will
result in hard to monitor and random performance. For another I'm
concerned with wasting a significant amount of memory for the OS cache
of all the read data that's guaranteed to never be needed (as we'll
*always* write to the relevant page shortly down the road). For those
reasons alone I think prefetching just into the OS cache is a bad idea,
and should be rejected.
I also would want something that's more compatible with DIO. But people
pushed back on that, so... As long as we build something that looks
like a request queue (which my proposal does), it's also something that
can later with some reduced effort be ported onto asynchronous io.
Greetings,
Andres Freund