Re: Add PostgreSQL 11 to feature matrix page?
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add PostgreSQL 11 to feature matrix page? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180609.080441.1991039314129303200.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add PostgreSQL 11 to feature matrix page? ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
>> On Jun 6, 2018, at 10:35 AM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net <mailto:magnus@hagander.net>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org <mailto:jkatz@postgresql.org>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jun 4, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org <mailto:jkatz@postgresql.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On May 24, 2018, at 10:09 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp <mailto:ishii@sraoss.co.jp>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [Moved to pgsql-www] >>>> >>>> Sorry for the slow reply! >>>> >>>>>>> Adding PostgreSQL 11 to the page will give users at-a-glance-dfference >>>>>>> between 11 and previous releases, which could bring clearner image of >>>>>>> 11 to the users. >>>>>> >>>>>> I do like this idea, but there are a few things to consider: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Traditionally, we’ve waited until closer to release (I believe RCs) before >>>>>> putting them up, due to the fact features can change. It is simple to remove >>>>>> features from the feature matrix, but I think it’s part of the final packaging to >>>>>> include the full list of features. >>>>> >>>>> But by definition, all features in beta (at least major ones) are >>>>> freezed and should not be changed unless there's a serious >>>>> technical/none technical issue. So the features in the matrix would >>>>> not be changed we expect. Also one of the purposes of beta is >>>>> encouraging users to test out the beta. Adding to the page will give >>>>> more chances to potential beta testers, I think. >>>> >>>> I don’t disagree. I need to make a test to see if this is possible with >>>> the current pgweb configuration. >>>> >>>> I will make a test on my local copy of pgweb to see how easy it is to add 11 >>>> to the list. I will report back if it is easy or not. If the former, I’ll make the suggestion >>>> of adding it to the site and see if there are any objections. >>> >>> So to get this to work we need to follow the standard process of adding in >>> a new version to the feature matrix: >>> >>> 1. Write a migration to support “v11” in the Feature model >>> 2. Add in the new features >>> >>> The one thing currently is that unless something in the code is changed, it >>> displays the full version number (e.g. “11”) without any indication of it being >>> in beta. Experimenting with the code, I don’t think it would be difficult to add >>> that in, but it is non trivial and I may have to change some of the sorting code >>> we are currently using. >>> >>> tl;dr >>> >>> If we’re ok with displaying “11” early without any indication of beta, this is trivial >>> and we just need to create the migration. If not, then it’s a bit of work, but it >>> may be worthwhile. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> I think it's perfectly fine to show it as 11. >> >> See attached for review. This follows the standard format we have used for >> adding new versions to the feature matrix. > > This patch has been applied. > > I’ve added a few of the PostgreSQL 11 features into the matrix just to get a basic > list going: > > https://www.postgresql.org/about/featurematrix/ <https://www.postgresql.org/about/featurematrix/> > > Skimming through it, we may be due for some reorganization and some new > categories, e.g. “Partitioning,” “Indexing” etc. > > I can think of some others after looking at it more thoroughly. This is very helpful. Thanks! Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления:
Предыдущее
От: Stephen FrostДата:
Сообщение: Re: Request for "editor" privilege for PostgreSQL Wiki page