Re: Portability concerns over pq_sendbyte?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Portability concerns over pq_sendbyte?
Дата
Msg-id 20180606162758.s57ca7twwz2fi72e@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Portability concerns over pq_sendbyte?  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Ответы Re: Portability concerns over pq_sendbyte?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018-May-24, Andrew Gierth wrote:

> In PG11, pq_sendbyte got changed from taking an int parameter to taking
> an int8.

> Would it be better for these to take unsigned values, or have unsigned
> variants?

Do you have an answer to this question?  Does anybody else?

(My guts tell me it'd be better to change these routines to take
unsigned values, without creating extra variants.  But guts frequently
misspeak.)

Andres, you own this open item, unless one of the other committers who
have participated in this thread would like to take it as their own.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Possible bug in logical replication.
Следующее
От: Konstantin Knizhnik
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq compression